Hello, and welcome back to another edition of American Dissident Voices. I’m your host, Erich Gliebe.

It’s been a little while since my last broadcast, but the reason for the lengthy pause is that I’ve been taking a serious, hard look at the big picture. I wanted to examine where exactly we are at this moment in time, see what is working for us and what isn’t, and understand the reality of how successful our tactics and strategy are in the present time. 

The National Alliance has been in existence for roughly forty years now. Here we are in the beginning months of 2013 and one look around and you can see that the overall quality of life in America is diminishing, and our people are facing a much, much bleaker future than we were in the early ‘70s. During the four decades this organization has been around, the overall strategy has remained the same, with some tactics added and others dropped. And while the Alliance has been able to generate some noise throughout the years, it has never been able to make a serious impact and effect the desirable change.

While there have been months of dire predictions from the Pentagon about spending cuts, one of the most visible for the military could resonate across the Middle East at a time when uncertainty continues to grip the region. The U.S. Navy may face the prospect of not being able to routinely keep two aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf region, which has been a longtime requirement for any ability to launch military campaigns in that part of the world. The United States would have to scale back to one carrier in the region if Congress can't avoid deep automatic spending cuts, including some $500 billion directed at the Pentagon over 10 years, a U.S. military official directly familiar with the Navy's latest preliminary budget analysis tells CNN.

The Navy has kept an on-and-off presence with two carriers in the Gulf region during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. And tensions with Iran intensified a year ago as Tehran threatened a blockade of U.S. carriers into the Persian Gulf. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta extended a directive to keep two carriers in that region last summer.

by Dr. William Pierce

A common belief among defenders of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is that the National Socialist government of Germany under Adolf Hitler did not permit the private ownership of firearms. Totalitarian governments, they have been taught in their high school civics classes, do not trust their citizens and do not dare permit them to keep firearms. Thus, one often hears the statement, "You know, the first thing the Nazis did when they came to power was outlaw firearms," or, "The first thing Hitler did in Germany was round up all the guns." One can understand why many American gun owners want to believe this. They see in the current effort of their own government to take away their right to keep and bear arms a limitation of an essential element of their freedom and a move toward tyranny, and they want to characterize the gun-grabbers in the most negative way they can. Adolf Hitler has been vilified continuously for the past 60 years or so by the mass media in America, and certainly no politician or officeholder wants to be compared with him. If the gun- confiscation effort can be portrayed convincingly as something of which Hitler would have approved, it will have been effectively tarred.

“There is,” noted Brutus, “a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries.” What was so for the affairs of Brutus and Cassius and other men – indeed, for all those who dare to venture from the sheltered harbor in which more timid men ride out their whole lives at anchor – also is so for organizations and movements.

The Alliance is now afloat on a full sea, and we must take the current which stands ready to serve us or lose our ventures. I’m not using the term “a full sea” quite the way Brutus did: I do not mean a White public desperate with fear and hunger, inflamed with hatred of the government which has betrayed them, and eager for a final reckoning. The Alliance still has much to do in the way of preparation for that day: in fact, most of our task must be completed by then, with only the reaping of the ripened harvest remaining.

What I do mean is the objective situation which has developed, rather than the reaction of the masses to that situation. The situation we have today is one of total bankruptcy for the liberal/egalitarian/Judaeo-Christian system which has been ascendant since the end of the Second World War. What is more, this bankruptcy is now manifest: every perceptive, intelligent White man or woman still able to reason clearly can see it. He can see the multiracial pestholes America’s major cities have become and which Europe’s major cities are fast becoming. He can see what has happened to our public schools and our universities. He can see what has happened to literature and the arts. He can see what is being promoted by television and the other mass media. He can smell the level to which electoral politics and government have descended. And he can remember all the promises and programs and propaganda of recent decades. It is clear to him or her that things will continue to become worse in the future, despite all of the promises. It is clear that all of the government’s programs to make things better are in fact making things worse. It is clear that the propaganda of “equality” and “diversity” and “multiculturalism” consists of malevolent lies. He may have no sympathy for us or event no knowledge of our ideology and goals. He may be such a spineless coward that he would deny he knew us if he did. He may even be a collaborator, hoping to gain a short-term advantage for himself by serving the Jews. But he knows, in broad terms, what has happened. He is no longer fooled, if he ever was, by the babbling of the fools and scoundrels who call darkness light and evil good. There always has been a perceptive minority who understood what was happening and could see where things were heading.  

From the Feb. 1999 NA Bulletin

"In the nine years he has been a member, Cleveland Local Unit Coordinator Erich Gliebe has been the most effective activist in the Alliance. He has been a tireless recruiter and organizer, a man who has spent nearly every available minute working for the Alliance.

His efforts at personal recruiting have been effective because he is persistent and conscientious. After he contacts a new person he sends the prospective recruit material repeatedly – especially American Dissident Voices tapes and copies of Free Speech – telephones him repeatedly, invites him to meetings, and more often than not eventually persuades him to join the Alliance.

In Cleveland he has built by far the largest Local Unit in the Alliance, and he has worked diligently to facilitate the formation of Local Units in other areas. Many of his weekends have been spent in travel to other cities in the Midwest, where he has organized meetings of local members to explore possibilities for building the Alliance.

If the Alliance had 100 more members with Erich’s energy and commitment, the Clinton gang would be actively exploring possibilities for refugee status in Israel."

A U.S. court ordered Russia to pay 50,000 dollars a day for using of the so-called Schneerson Library - a collection of ancient Jewish religious literature. Moscow will have to pay the money to Jewish Chassidic movement Chabad Lubavitch until it returns the Schneerson Collection. This collection of books and manuscripts used to belong to one of the leaders of the movement - late Rabbi Joseph Isaac Schneerson.

The library counts 12,000 books, 50,000 other documents and 381 manuscripts. Russia does not recognize Chabad Lubavitch's claims as the collection had been kept in Russia during all these years. In addition, the Schneerson family has no heirs to the unique collection. The U.S. Justice agrees with the position of Moscow, but District of Columbia Judge Royce Lamberth, who took the decision, rejected the objections of the Justice Ministry. The litigation on the Schneerson Library continues for several years in U.S. courts. In early August 2010, Judge Lamberth said that books and manuscripts were kept in the Russian State Library and Russian military archives "illegally," and that the Hasidim had all rights for them. Russia's reaction was tough. Russian Foreign Ministry officials clearly stated that there would be no return made at all.  

Pravda.ru

By Stanislav Mishin via Pravda.ru

These days, there are few few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bare arms and use deadly force to defend one's self and possessions. This will probably come as a total shock to most of my Western readers, but at one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth. This was, of course, when we were free under the Tsar. Weapons, from swords and spears to pistols, rifles and shotguns were everywhere, common items. People carried them concealed, they carried them holstered. Fighting knives were a prominent part of many traditional attires and those little tubes criss crossing on the costumes of Cossacks and various Caucasian peoples? Well those are bullet holders for rifles. Various armies, such as the Poles, during the Смута (Times of Troubles), or Napoleon, or the Germans even as the Tsarist state collapsed under the weight of WW1 and Wall Street monies, found that holding Russian lands was much much harder than taking them and taking was no easy walk in the park but a blood bath all its own. In holding, one faced an extremely well armed and aggressive population Hell bent on exterminating or driving out the aggressor.

Avoiding Chaos and Building a Viable Movement

By Erich Gliebe

Hello, and welcome back to another edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

First off, as I’ve previously mentioned, National Alliance founder Dr. William Pierce’s epic race/history book, Who We Are, has been published and is available online at www.lulu.com. I’ve been picking up my copy of Who We Are every chance I get and find it quite hard to put down. Starting with the origin of the White race, this book focuses on the details of early European racial history, the racial reasons behind the fall of the Classical Grecian and Roman civilizations, the White nations of the Middle East, the rise of the Germanic powers, the Vikings, National Socialist Germany, World War Two, and the racial crisis facing the West today.

Who We Are contains a highly critical appraisal of Jewish influence in Europe, and ends with a proposal on how the essence of the West can be saved. Who We Are is a must-have for every racially conscious White person and makes a great gift.

There was another school shooting this month and, unfortunately, I’m not surprised. We are living in an unnatural world in which quantity is stressed over quality of life. We are living in a materialistic society in which the majority of its inhabitants must feel like they’re made to consume, and they are detached from reality. For the record, the school shooter at a Connecticut elementary school, Adam Lanza, had some serious emotional problems and was a walking and ticking time bomb. Some of Lanza’s former classmates said they weren’t surprised to hear of the atrocities he carried out. I’ve always said it’s all in the eyes, and one look into his eyes and you can see that this young guy was a lunatic who belonged in a padded room.

The person I blame the most for the school shooting, besides Adam Lanza, is his mom, Nancy Lanza, who was the first person her son killed. What was Nancy thinking by teaching her son to shoot and leaving her guns lying around the house to where crazy Adam had full access to them? When I look at Nancy Lanza I see a spoiled, materialistic whack job who received an astounding $350,000 a year in alimony. Leaving guns around the house within reach of Adam? I wouldn’t have left a butter knife around Adam Lanza!

Pravda.ru

In spite of the fact that Orthodoxy is still the largest mass religion in Russia, the number of Christians in the country has dropped by six percent in the country during the recent three years - from 80 to 74 percent. According to Levada Center, the percentage of citizens practicing Islam has increased from four to seven percent. The number of those who do not ascribe themselves to any religion has grown too. Three years ago, there were eight percent of such people. Nowadays, the number has grown to ten percent. The number of atheists has dropped by one per cent - there are five percent of them. The survey also found that the percentage of Orthodox believers who attend the church is 76 percent, which means that one in four believers does not go there. A third of respondents go to the church to light a candle and pray. Twenty-nine percent attended christening, wedding or funeral ceremonies. Most believers go to the church once a year or a little more often; 20 percent have never even been there. Interestingly, 61 percent of those who identify themselves as Christians have never held a Bible in their hands.

This is a topic I’ve written about before, but it merits repeated discussion. There’s a new mood in the air, a new spirit. We can feel it, and the enemies of our people can feel it. It affects their behavior – and, to a lesser extent, ours. It accounts for much of the increased shrillness in enemy propaganda. It is what makes us more buoyant, resilient, and optimistic than we ever have been in the past, despite the enormous difficulties we still face and the lack of any really concrete changes in our situation.

Someone trying to analyze the present situation can easily become confused, because there are many things going on at the same time. On the one hand the Jews are corrupting more and more White children with their racemixing and White-guilt propaganda on television and in the schools. One sees more White women debasing themselves with non-Whites than ever before, and more White youngsters absorbing the hip-hop culture from Murray Rothstein’s MTV. The White socioeconomic elite – the country-club set – is just as cowardly and treasonous as ever, terrified of being considered Politically Incorrect and disgustingly eager to curry favor with the enemies of our people. The government, despite the pseudo-patriotic rhetoric of the Republicans, has not changed its ways at all and currently is debating the best way to scuttle what’s left of the Bill of Rights. The White Masses are as foolish, shortsighted, and selfish as ever. Looking at things objectively, the Jews seem to have a tighter grip on our people than ever before. So, why are they becoming so shrill? Why are they doing so many things which betray their lack of confidence in the future? If things are on the course they want, why are they overplaying their hand and irritating so many people who might otherwise not notice what’s happening? Why do they do unnecessary things, such as pushing so aggressively and noticeably for an end to free speech in the United States?

Originally published as a series in his newspaper and magazine, this book is the final work of Dr. William Pierce, one of the most famous leaders of the White nationalist movement in America.  

Starting with the evolutionary origin of the White race, this book focuses on early European racial history, the racial reasons behind the fall of Classical Grecian and Roman civilizations, the Vikings, Christianity, Nazi Germany, World War II, and the racial crisis facing the West today.

The book is available here

By Ralph Forbes

The establishment media tells a tangled tale about the scandal that forced the resignation of David H. Petraeus as Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director. However, there are important details that shed new light on the matter compared to what the mainstream media has been reporting. Many believe the scandal was a set-up designed to bring down the general precisely because he was a highly-placed figure standing in opposition to the push by Israel’s current rulers to engage the United States in a war against Iran. Although previously a favorite of neoconservative supporters of Israel, Petraeus ended up on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ‘destroy’ list after the general testified before Congress on March 16, 2010, that U.S. interests and Israeli interests are not identical; Israel is a strategic burden, not an asset, to the United States; and Israeli policies endanger the lives of our troops. The reaction to the candid remarks by Petraeus provides a revealing list of his critics. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.)—a personal friend of Netanyahu and a leading supporter of Israel—was outraged. Foreign Policy, a magazine of the Foreign Policy Association, whined that Petraeus was “hardening” U.S. policy toward Israel. Abe Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, issued a statement condemning Petraeus.