Freedom Is Not Free
Posted on: 2012-07-01 05:26:27
ADV Broadcast Of June 23, 2012
Welcome to this week’s broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.
Now the star of the game for the winning Italians was striker Mario Balotelli. Sounds like a nice Italian name, and I bet he looked like a typical Italian soccer player, right? Wrong. Balotelli is as black as the ace of spades and is actually of Ghanaian descent. Born in Palermo to Ghanaian parents, Balotelli was actually raised by foster parents, Francesco and Sylvia Balotelli, who are said to be of mixed Italian and Jewish heritage.
So that about sums up the racial state of affairs in Europe. The star of the Italian national soccer team is Black, and half the German team refuses to sing the German anthem for the simple reason that they are not German. Anyway, we American White racialists certainly wish our European kinsmen well in taking their countries back from the corrupt politicians who allow their nations to be encroached upon by Third World invaders.
It’s hard to imagine what the Founding Fathers would say to us today if they could see what’s become of the country they brought into being. Certainly they would be amazed at all of the technological gadgetry, not to mention the vast infrastructure and the transportation systems that tie everything together. Chances are, those would be the first things that catch their attention, and those things might capture their interest for quite a while – a week or more, maybe. But pretty soon, the novelty and the wonder about all of the electronics and communications media would have worn off, except for perhaps Benjamin Franklin, who was not only a smooth-talking statesman who almost single-handedly was able to bring France into the Revolutionary War on the side of the Colonies, but was also a first-rate scientist who was a world leader in the study of electricity.
And after the newness of everything had worn off, the Founding Fathers undoubtedly would have looked deeper into what America had become. After all, this was the nation that they had risked everything to found; one doesn’t snub what was the most powerful nation on Earth at the time without the possibility that one will be defeated and lose not only freedom and property, but also historical reputation, which – for some White men – might be the worst punishment of all.
And when the Founding Fathers looked more deeply into the America of the 21st Century, there is a good chance that they wouldn’t like what they saw. They would probably be aghast at the level of taxation that has been imposed on the people to prop up an inefficient government that sticks its nose into the internal affairs of other nations and shows itself more and more every decade to be yet further from what Abraham Lincoln called, in the famous Gettysburg Address, a government “of the people, by the people, and for the people.”
They would be appalled at the nation’s willingness to subsidize with food, clothing, and housing an army of people who, at best, make only a half-hearted effort to provide for themselves and who, at worst, make a whole-hearted effort to procreate early and often, and for as many years as Nature will allow.
They would be quick to comprehend the true power wielded by the mass media of news and entertainment, and they would immediately understand that those who held the reins of that power – and not the American people – were the rulers of the country.
The Founding Fathers would probably frown at how George W. Bush has surrounded himself with aliens who have an agenda that is equal parts pro-alien and anti-White, and they most certainly would have been sickened by the way in which Bush has prostituted himself to curry the favor of those aliens and dishonored himself and his country in doing their bidding.
Now, whether or not the Founding Fathers would have touched explicitly on the concept of race in delineating their objections to the America that we experience today, there can be no doubt that, to a man, the Founding Fathers were quite conscious of race and quite intent that the integrity of the White race must remain intact. One year after George Washington became America’s first Chief Executive, the Naturalization Act of 1790 was passed, which limited citizenship to “free white persons.” For Blacks, mestizos, or East or South Asians to play a role in this country would have been unthinkable.
So it is likely that a Founding Father who could comment about what America has become in the last 200 years would use explicitly racial terms in describing what he sees. But whether race came up or not, it is almost certain that the Founding Fathers would notice that, despite an omnipotent media that attempts to make every American think, feel, and behave the same way, there is a palpable feeling of disconnectedness that clings to every aspect of American life in the 21st Century. All of the media’s efforts notwithstanding, America is being torn apart: there is more disagreement, more conflict, more “minding one’s own business” than there has ever been. And all of this alienation is a direct result of a situation that the Founding Fathers tried to avoid, through legislation like the Naturalization Act of 1790. That situation was a racially polyglot country, in which the people had no common history and no common destiny.
Since hindsight is 20/20, we can look back now and say that, unfortunately, the Founding Fathers were more worried about freedom than about race. Their viewpoint is understandable; in their day, pretty much everyone was White, and it was assumed that things would stay that way. Blacks were a tiny and enslaved minority, and it was assumed that things would stay that way. The media didn’t have nearly the power that it has today, and no Jews controlled the media that did exist, and it was assumed that things would stay that way.
And so the Founding Fathers spent most of their time tackling the problems that were the most pressing to them: a system of government based on a checks-and-balances system, freedom of speech and of the press, freedom of religion, the right to keep and bear arms, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures, and so on. Their attempt to lay out a non-tyrannical system of government resulted in the United States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights served to limit, as best the Fathers could foresee, the potentially-intrusive power of that government.
So, despite the understanding that the new nation was – to the core – a White nation that was meant to remain White, the Founding Fathers didn’t explicitly make the United States a White racial state. They didn’t put the White race at the top of their list of priorities because everyone was on the same page on the matter. It was understood that temporary agreements might be made with the Indians, but virtually all White Americans at the time of the nation’s founding viewed the relationship between Whites and Indians as a “Them vs. Us” relationship. There might be temporary alliances…but only temporary ones. Blacks were valuable as workers on the plantations, but they were definitely second- or third-class citizens. Of course, today we know that NO number of non-Whites must be permitted within the White racial state that we in the National Alliance envision, but we’ll deal with that later.
A hundred and fifty years later, when Adolf Hitler came to power in Germany, he and many other National Socialists from every nation in Europe clearly understood the need to be explicit about race. From years of contact with Jews in Germany and from seeing the debilitating effect of integration and mongrelization on the vitality of neighboring France, Hitler made race the foremost issue throughout Germany, and hundreds of thousands of non-German Europeans welcomed his putting race at the front and center of European politics. From the open-arms welcome that German troops received throughout much of conquered Europe – especially in Eastern Europe, where the people knew firsthand of the communist poison – to the volunteer military units of every European nationality that were formed to destroy that poison, it was clear to Europeans at the time that National Socialism, far from being merely a Pan-German Folk movement, was a new philosophy that was meant to embrace the entire White race.
But the Founding Fathers lacked the long-term, close contact with the non-White races that the National Socialists knew about in the 1920s and 1930s, and that we know about today. And because they focused on freedom rather than racial integrity, the Founding Fathers inadvertently have put us in the position today in which we have nearly lost BOTH our freedom and our racial integrity.
The love of freedom is a trait that all humans possess to some degree but, according to the late founder of the National Alliance, Dr. William L. Pierce, our race has a particularly strong regard for individual freedom. We don’t like to be told what to do, and we’ll continue doing what we don’t what to do for only so long. Furthermore, we don’t like to be told what to think: what’s right and what’s wrong, which ideas about God are correct, and so on.
The love of these freedoms is what drove our European ancestors by the millions to make the journey to America to start a new life. Some wanted the freedom to worship as they wished to. Some came in search of land and opportunity. But in every case, it all boiled down to freedom: freedom to think and act how they wanted to, freedom to be their own masters on land that provided for their needs and brought in an adequate income as well, and freedom to live in peace without the interference of tyrannical rulers whose concerns were more focused on keeping the royal coffers filled than on the well-being of the people.
And the nation that the Founding Fathers constructed was a direct reflection of these shared values regarding freedom. Individual freedom was maximized and the power of the government that was agreed-upon to be necessary was kept to a minimum. With the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, it seemed that a utopia on Earth had finally been achieved, and that utopian vision is still the one that is pumped into the heads of American schoolchildren, despite the fact that it is pure fantasy.
There were two problems with the new democratic system as it was set up by the Founding Fathers. The first, which I’ve already mentioned, was that there was very little explicit reference to race, and there was very little put into place that was meant to ensure the racial integrity of the nation. This flaw will prove fatal in the end, as we are clearly seeing in everything that goes on around us today. Even before the nation was one hundred years old, this flaw had created a rift in the country that led to the Civil War which, unfortunately, only weakened the White racial stock of the country and did nothing in the way of fixing this flaw. In fact, eventually, the Civil War only led to even more breaches of the wall of racial integrity. Explicit White racialism from Day One – rather than implicit racialism – might have channeled the energies of the nation into more productive channels over the past two centuries.
Anyway, the other problem with the new democratic system was the assumption that every man – or, in the words of the Naturalization Act of 1790, every “free white person” – will take an active interest in the governance of the nation. In other words, the idea of a government “by the people” is a myth. Most people are far more concerned with their own lives than with the activities of government and, furthermore, most either don’t want to take the time or don’t have the mental wherewithal to understand all of the policies and actions of government. The only time that most people start paying close attention to what the government is doing is when its actions directly affect their lives and livelihoods. In a letter to John Hancock, George Washington complained about the self-centeredness among the men of the Continental Army:
“When men are irritated, & the Passions inflamed, they fly hastily, and chearfully to Arms, but after the first emotions are over to expect that they are influenced by any other principles than those of Interest, is to look for what never did, & I fear never will happen.”
So, contrary to the assumptions of a supposedly freedom-loving democracy, self-interest rules the roost, and participating actively in running the country is way down on the list of priorities for most people. And that is a good thing, because if everyone wanted to actively participate in governing the country, it would be total chaos. Nothing would ever get done, and a smoothly-running society would be out of the question.
Unfortunately, because there were essentially no explicit principles of White racialism in the founding of America, a certain group with an egomaniacal self-interest took advantage of the freedoms that WERE explicit and soon came to dominate the nation. That group, of course, was the Jews. In this country, they started out mainly in the world of trade and commerce, and later moved into finance and the fledgling mass media. Today, our country is riddled with them, from the media moguls and the financial giants to the advisors of government and the “leading thinkers and doers” in every field of endeavor.
And obviously, the weight of the media contributes to Jewish advancement everywhere. That is WHY there are so many Jewish stars in music and Hollywood; that is WHY Jews seem to be at the top of every field of endeavor; that is WHY Israel is venerated by every mass media outlet; that is WHY most Americans probably think that criticizing the Jews is a criminal offense, even though it isn’t – YET.
And the Jewish establishment now uses the American government, which was established to preserve freedom, to take away the right of Iraqis and Afghans to rule themselves. The Jewish establishment now uses the American government to take away the rights of American citizens so that illegal immigrants can further pollute what’s left of the White racial gene pool in this country.
On July 4, 1776, the Declaration of Independence was signed on the understanding that it was immoral for one political entity to coerce another to do its bidding. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights were signed on the understanding that it was immoral for the state to coerce its citizens to think and act in a certain way. The freedoms that Americans have taken for granted for more than two centuries are meant to protect U.S. citizens from coercion – from having to do what someone else wants one to do.
Unfortunately, the Jews have taken those freedoms, used them to gain their present posts of power, and are now flexing that power to coerce the rest of us to think and act like THEY want us to. They WANT us to welcome more and more non-Whites into our country. They WANT our young people to turn away from their own racial heritage, to become Africanized through Black music, and to court and wed non-Whites. And the freedoms that we have to speak out against all of this? They want to destroy them.
White racialists want freedom for our race. We see what a multiracial society does to all of its members, and we are tired of being coerced by a Jewish establishment that cares not a whit for our freedoms, either the freedom of our whole race or our freedom to speak out against what we see as wrong, not to mention our freedom to defend ourselves by force of arms.
On this upcoming Independence Day, I’d like you to imagine the spirit of excitement and unity that would pulse through the all-White nation that we in the National Alliance are striving to bring into being. And then I’d like you to choose to do something about it, by joining forces with me and the other members of the National Alliance. With an all-White nation with an explicitly racialist foundation, our racial freedoms and our individual freedoms will pave the way for a new and glorious future for our people.
I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.