The Middle East, Democracy, And The Media
Posted by Robert Ransdell on: 2011-02-19 23:11:24
ADV Broadcast Of February 19, 2011
Hello, and welcome back to another broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.
Just like most of you, in recent weeks I’ve been watching news events coming out of the Middle East and North Africa and trying to read between the lines to determine what is actually occurring, rather than just taking the mainstream media’s feed.
With Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak resigning last week after 18 days of protests and 30 years in power, it’ll be interesting to see which way the new Egyptian government will swing. Now when I say, “swing,” I’m not trying to be cute. It was obvious to see which way Mubarak swung, as the former president became a wealthy billionaire, as his country (or his cronies) received $billions from U.S. taxpayers over the years, with one of the stipulations being that they remain friendly with the Zionist state of Israel. In one of the images coming out of a recent Cairo demonstration, a demonstrator was seen holding a poster of Mubarak with a Star of David stamped on his forehead, a clear indication that many Egyptians saw their former president as being a sell-out to Zionist interests.
I actually believe the demonstrations in the Middle East and the resignation of Egyptian President Mubarak caught the Jews and their lackeys off guard, and they are now trying to figure out the best way to deal with the tension, primarily for the sake of Israel. Besides Egypt, there have also been demonstrations in Tunisia, Yemen, Bahrain, and Iran, the latter of which is probably most concerning to the Israelis and their Zionist interests in America.
Of course, what is actually taking place in the Middle East can be quite different as to how the mainstream media reports things. Whenever I watch the news I am always interested in seeing what kind of spin the Jewish-controlled media puts on a particular event. And the spin the Jewish media always takes on Iran, is that evil men who repress their citizens and want to wipe Israel off the map run the Middle East nation.
With things in Iran being the way they are – with a hard-line, Islamic government that finds itself an outcast in the Jew-dominated community of nations – there isn’t a lot of good and reliable information that finds its way out of the country and into the Western media. Most of the foreign media representatives in Iran have been told to remain in their offices and away from the streets; that is, if they haven’t voluntarily fled the country for safer places on the planet.
And no matter what news gets out of the country – whether it’s good news or bad – the Jew-dominated Western media certainly aren’t going to go out of their way to give us much of a balanced look at things in Iran. With the media in the U.S. and most of Europe, the very obvious slant to the news from Iran is that those in favor of reform are in the right, while the entrenched Islamic power structure under the authority of the Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei, is in the wrong. For example, we hear news reports that the government of Iran has been rifling at will through people’s e-mails and listening in on phone calls. Are we supposed to be shocked that a government would invade the privacy of its own citizens? In this day and age when power is everything and information leads to power, does anyone really believe that our own federal government is above that sort of privacy invasion?
The Iranian government has already admitted that there have been election irregularities in many districts throughout Iran, but they say that those irregularities do not affect the results of elections. None of this makes much difference to those of us who know that there are always irregularities in a mass democracy. In fact, the biggest irregularity with mass democracy is the system itself; historically speaking, mass democracy is the biggest irregularity of all, something that is rarely seen and, when it does rear its ugly and puny head, it is so short-lived as to be virtually insignificant.
Speaking of voting irregularities, we aren’t immune to those in the United States. Think about what happened in Florida in the Presidential election of 2000, when Florida’s electoral votes were first awarded to Democrat Al Gore and then the media changed their mind and told us that the Republican George W. Bush had taken the state. When the situation was investigated, there were questions about ballots being tossed, pregnant chads, and all sorts of other strange incidents. And no doubt the history of the United States is full of similar fraudulent elections – not as far-reaching as the events in Florida perhaps – but nonetheless fraudulent. A friend of mine from Chicago tells me that only a few decades ago, the phrase among voters in Chicago was: “Vote early; vote often.” Democracy, as I said earlier, is essentially one big historical irregularity.
Perhaps the strangest thing about mass democracy in the United States today – one might say, the biggest irregularity of the irregularity itself – is that few people seem to understand the role played by the mass media of news and entertainment in the operation and manipulation of that system. The media – or, more specifically, the men who control the media – influence mass democracy in two ways: first, they steer people’s thoughts in whatever direction they choose, and second, they exert a strong influence in the election of the particular person that they prefer in a slate of candidates.
For the first way, the media help to steer people’s thoughts – and therefore, their behaviors – in certain, media-desired directions. Every newscast, no matter how allegedly unbiased, is potentially a ploy to influence people’s thoughts and behavior. Every article in the newspaper – or online, or in a magazine – no matter how allegedly unbiased, is potentially a ploy to influence people’s thoughts and behavior. Every book, no matter how allegedly unbiased, is potentially a ploy to influence people’s thoughts and behavior. The same goes for every film, every sitcom, every children’s cartoon, and every reality show. Every piece of music influences people’s views of what is acceptable and appropriate and what is not. This broadcast is potentially a ploy to influence your thoughts and behavior. Actually, it isn’t even POTENTIALLY a ploy; it definitely IS a ploy in that direction. But you should have known that already and, even if you didn’t, I do my best to be honest with you and tell you the truth as I understand it.
At any rate, the contention among White racialist observers is that organized Jewry has gained control over much of the mass media of this country and is consciously using those media to destroy the White race. How could we think otherwise, given the effect of the media’s efforts on the physical and spiritual health of our people? If destruction of the White race is NOT their ultimate plan, then we need to start seeing some serious pro-White propaganda in the Jewish media in order to offset all of the damage those media have done over the last century or so. But you and I both know that that will NEVER happen, which only further proves that the Jews in control of the media know exactly what they are doing, which is that they are consciously trying to exterminate (albeit slowly) the White race.
So if the media masters want to make something acceptable in our society, all they need to do is to inundate the American public with suggestions to that effect in every media outlet and, more than likely, the idea will start to gain some public favor before too long.
After all, that’s what the media did with things like desegregation, back in the 1950s and 1960s. That’s what the media is doing right now with interracial relationships. The media’s campaign worked with desegregation, and it’s working with interracial relationships. Look around you, and everywhere you’ll see interracial romance glorified by the Jewish media. Consider the virtual media frenzy over interracial families and relationships with awful TV reality shows featuring such families as in Keeping Up with the Kardashians, a family of part-Armenian girls who date or marry Black athletes; Kendra, a blond Playboy model who married a Black football player and with whom she has a mongrel child; and Jon and Kate Plus 8, featuring an Asian husband, his White wife, and their eight half-breed children splashed all over the media world, NOT because it is a great human interest story, but because it is a perfect way for the Jewish media masters to make the idea of miscegenation palatable to a nation of spiritless zombies.
As to the second way in which the media influence mass democracy, what it boils down to is that they can move candidates into and out of office, much as a chess player moves pieces on a chess board so as to gain the greatest possible advantage. If any candidate comes out strongly on an issue that the Jews are vehemently opposed to, the media splatter that fact to the four winds. Then, in conjunction with all of the up-front work the media has done in newscasts, TV, and movies with regard to “right-thinking” for American citizens, such a candidate can pretty well kiss election goodbye. This is especially true in a national election, such as for U.S. President or with someone who is running for Congress, but it also occurs at the lower levels of government. In such a way, by and large, the media get the people whom THEY WANT elected.
It doesn’t always quite work out the Jews’ way, of course. They can’t always get everybody elected that they want, at least not every time. Sometimes the Jews have to kick and bite and scratch and hiss for years before they get their way. Consider the case of Paul Findley, a former Illinois Congressional representative, who served in the House for 22 years and was an outspoken critic of the relationship between the U.S. and Israel. His book, They Dare to Speak Out, originally published in 1985 and reprinted most recently in 2003, documents the effect that the pro-Israel lobby has on the foreign and domestic policy that comes out of Washington. Findley was a thorn in the side of the Jews for years, and they did everything they could to defeat him at the polls. At last, in 1982, with his opponent heavily financed by pro-Jewish forces, Findley lost his bid for re-election.
So, although the Jews had to put up with Paul Findley for over two decades, in the long run things still DID go their way. For one thing, they had filled virtually every other seat in the House and Senate with candidates who didn’t have Paul Findley’s guts and integrity, and so Findley’s reasoned arguments against the insane pro-Israel bias by the U.S. government fell on deaf ears. And two, the Jews eventually were able to defeat Findley in an election. Had the Congress been full of Paul Findleys during the ‘60s and ‘70s, the United States wouldn’t have been such a willing bully-boy of Israel in the Middle East during those turbulent times.
All of this brings us back to Iran, where it seems the media Jews and their Zionist-friendly politicians in the U.S. have hopes of installing new leaders who might actually be “bought” or gullible enough to believe in the official Holocaust story. For obvious reasons, Jews everywhere – not just the ones who are in control of America’s media – are thrilled at the prospect of a divided Iran, and no rational observer has any doubts that the Jews are doing what they can behind the scenes to foment the unrest in Tehran. After all, for as long as we Whites have had contact with Jews, meddling in other people’s affairs and trying to manipulate those affairs to their own advantage is what Jews do best. Why should this be any different?
One thing we have heard out of the Islamic Republic is the accusation by the Iranian government of the U.S. and Britain prying into its election affairs. The response we Americans are SUPPOSED to have to this news – the response the Jewish media have primed us for during years of brainwashing – is to scoff at Khamenei and Ahmadinejad, call them liars, and feel self-righteous about ourselves as being “THE democracy” on the planet, where individual liberty and freedom are jealously guarded by a vigilant and user-friendly government.
Now it’s my turn to scoff. Ask Ernst Zundel – the historical revisionist who publicly expressed doubts about the official version of the so-called Holocaust –about individual liberty and freedom; he was deported from the U.S and sentenced to prison in Germany for his non-conformist views. Ask former Alliance Chairman Shaun Walker about individual liberty and freedom; although he’s since been released, he was sent to prison on trumped-up charges on bogus civil rights violations. Ask retired Cleveland autoworker John Demjanjuk, who was deported from his Ohio home and at 90 years of age is currently undergoing a show trial in Munich, Germany over some fictitious “war crime” charges. So much for mass democracy ensuring the rights of all individuals. Mass democracy only ensures the rights of those favored by those in power.
In the United States, the Jewish media have most of the power, and so those the Jewish media favor get the advantages. In Iran, the established order has most of the power, and those it favors get the advantages.
The reformists in Iran are perhaps learning that lesson only now. If they’re smart, they’ll realize soon that democracy is a sham and make plans for a better future. If we’re smart, we’ll realize the same thing.
I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.
News Source: Erich Gliebe